Skip to content

How about making your own didgeridoo ?!

Home made Didgeridoo still in work

We cannot say that the eucalyptus trees dug by termites run through the forests in our latitudes! And it is precisely for this reason that for a few years now many didgeridoo players have decided to make their own instruments. The principle is simple: split a branch into two parts, hollow out the latter and glue everything back together. Like that, doesn’t it look silly ?! The principle is indeed basic, but you will see that the experience of the manufacturers could well enlighten us on the errors to be avoided! Over the years, this technique has proven itself. It is not uncommon to come across a player with an instrument that he has created himself. In any case, much more frequent than a violinist who would have made his violin!
The didgeridoo definitely has more than one trick up its sleeve.

Happy are the simple pieces of wood

The didgeridoo has indeed a big advantage for him: it is an instrument of a simple form. So obviously, if you are a bit of a handyman, the idea of making one quickly comes to mind. Well, sure unless you’re excessively good, you won’t get a high-end didgeridoo the first time around, but you will at least have something to have fun with for quite a while. The trick is to respect a few basics to make sure that your didgeridoo will ring a minimum.
So, how do you go about creating your didgeridoo? What types of wood to choose? What form to give it? What size ? To all these questions, I will try to provide you with answers!

Step 1: Which species of wood to choose for your didgeridoo?

It sounds silly like that, but no branch, no didgeridoo! You will therefore have to provide you with raw materials. And this is certainly the most important step in the process. Indeed, not all woods sound the same. Certain essences will indeed be much more gifted than their neighbor for music.

Forget the softwoods for your didgeridoo!

These antlers are far too light to make a good didgeridoo. Forget pine, fir and spruce, even if this can vary, the density of conifers that we find in our region is often very low: from 0.40 to 0.50. Obviously, it is tempting to make an instrument as light as air, but this will have unfortunate consequences on the sound (especially on the bass). To go further, you can read my article on the psychology of a didgeridoo. Keep in mind that a didgeridoo must have a minimum of weight and density to claim a balanced sound.

Instead, go see the hardwoods, they are more suited to the didgeridoo!

It is then towards deciduous trees that we will turn, quite simply because we find them with good densities in our forests. Thanks to Jethro who posted a topic on francedidgeridoo.com (fr) . This information will greatly help us to have an overview of the densities of the different woods.

Very light 0.40 to 0.50

Poplar
Aspen
Lime tree

Light 0.60 to 0.65

Birch
Elm
Ash
Plane tree
Soft beech
Walnut
Chestnut

Light heavy A 0.65 to 0.80

Mulberry
Hawthorn

Medium heavy B 0.65 to 0.80

Oak
Hard beech
Hard ash
Fruit woods
Acacia
Sycamore maple

Heavy 0.80 to 1

Charm
Cormier
Boxwood
Olivier
Holly

I deliberately deleted the woods that were not easily found in our latitudes in order to make the table more readable.

Very light category (0.40 to 0.50)

These may be hardwoods, but they are nonetheless too light (like conifers). We will therefore not choose them to make our didgeridoo. We want it to ring in the cottages!

Light category (0.60 to 0.65)

The use of woods in this category is often mentioned in the testimonials of manufacturers of herbs. Normally if you follow well you will be surprised that we use wood with a rather light density ?! Yes it’s true… The density remains low here. Keep in mind, however, that these densities are only indications and may vary depending on the conditions in which the tree has grown. A dry climate will give a denser tree, conversely in a humid climate.
However, at the risk of positioning myself alone against everyone, I think that one of the big faults of current sandwiches is precisely their weight. Many amateur (and professional) manufacturers would benefit from leaving more material or using a little denser wood. In my opinion, this is one of the aspects that could easily be improved. The sound is much more stable with material.
To conclude, most of the wood in this category comes from common trees and therefore easy to find. Despite my previous argument, if you find this type of gasoline go for it. Because by shaping it the right way, it will sound much better than your PVC tube! Over the years, I settle down a bit and I become more and more demanding. Don’t listen to me all the time and keep your beginner soul. If a piece of wood inspires you, give it a go!

Light Heavy Category A (0.65 to 0.70)

If you can make a didgeridoo with a mulberry tree then well done, you have a nugget here. Needless to say, mulberry trees will have a trunk much too small to make a didgeridoo, but Hawthorn produces trunks that can reach an interesting diameter. In view of its density, Hawthorn is a wood to keep in mind.

Light heavyweight category B (0.70 to 0.80)

Many of these woods are of particular interest to us. With the exception of oak, whose acoustic qualities are not wonderful, other species such as fruit trees, beech, ash and maple are especially valued in the manufacture of didgeridoo. I highly recommend them to you.

Heavyweight category (0.80 to 1)

There, we are in the heavy of heavy! These four essences often sound very good. A boxwood with the right diameter will be difficult to find. You may want to cut one off discreetly as you walk around … But please don’t. A boxwood grows between 10 and 20 centimeters per year, it may take 20 years to reach a suitable size for an instrument. Boxwood didgeridoos are very rare. If you come across a fallen tree then you can give it a try. Otherwise, fall back on more common essences that will sound great.

List of species to favor in the manufacture of a didgeridoo

Here is the selection of woods that will almost certainly give you a great sound! You will notice that there is still a good bunch of them! Be careful, the more you increase in density, the more difficult the wood will be to dig. Density has to be paid for!

Light 0.60 to 0.65

Birch
Elm
Ash
Plane tree
Soft beech
Walnut
Chestnut

Medium heavy 0.70 to 0.80

Hard beech
Hard ash
Fruit woods
Acacia
Sycamore maple

Heavy 0.80 to 1

Charm
Boxwood
Olivier
Holly

Step 2: the dimensions of a balanced didgeridoo

At this point you have your branch. It’s time to think about the shape of your didgeridoo. Logically, you will tell me that it depends on the shape of your branch! It’s not wrong (cuckoo Perceval). However, if I can give you a piece of advice: keep some leeway.

Let me explain.

The outer diameter

Often the diameter is one of the traps of the first sandidg (this is what we call a didgeridoo made in this way). We go on a very thin branch. I had done that also with my first instrument. If I dare say “instrument”! I had taken a very thin branch. Then I cut it, dug it (very very very!) Badly, then glued it back together. The didgeridoo was just not a didgeridoo. It had so many splinters inside that it was worse than a teak or a eucalyptus hollowed out by the screw. A very bad job what, in addition to a diameter far too thin.

When you choose your branch, take a minimum diameter of 70 mm at the mouth and 110 mm at the bell. It is much more interesting to have too many diameters than not enough. If, once dug, your didgeridoo has too much wood, you can remove it. Which is not possible, you will agree, otherwise.

The inner diameter: the air column

Here is an example of the dimensions to apply to the mouthpiece and the bell to ensure you have a balanced didgeridoo. Please note that I am talking about the interior dimensions of the air column here.
For the mouthpiece, aim around 40mm. To put it simply, the more you open the air column at the start, the more round the sound will be and conversely, the more you will shrink it, the more dry and dynamic the sound will be. Find this information in the article of the 4 criteria of a didgeridoo . As for the bell, don’t make it too big. This is useless and will deteriorate your sound. An internal diameter of 90mm looks very good.
Finally, for the size of the instrument, choose a length between 1m40 and 1m60.

Of course, these are only indications, do not all go to make an instrument cloned on these dimensions! If your branch doesn’t exactly match the dimensions, that’s okay. There are much more serious things in life, like climate change or even running out of dark chocolate on a winter evening huddled by the fire, herbal tea in hand.

With such dimensions, you make sure you have a didgeridoo that will sound.
Yes, but on condition that you follow the last two tips below.

Tips 1: Think of your didgeridoo as a third party

I could not say where this story of thirds comes from, but it is something now admitted in the world of the didgeridoo: a didgeridoo is thought (at least) in three thirds.
Concretely, measure your trunk, divide its size by three, this will give you three thirds (so far that’s fine!). Draw them on your branch to clearly delineate the sections. If you’ve read my articles (haven’t you read them?), You are aware that a didgeridoo is a clever mix of conical and cylindrical shape. We will therefore have to think of these thirds in a conical or cylindrical shape. Depending on the pattern chosen, this will significantly change your sound. To summarize, here are four possibilities that your didgeridoo could be inspired by.

diagram of a conical didgeridoo

Diagram 1 – 100% conical didgeridoo

diagram of a cylindrical, conical and conical didgeridoo

Diagram 2 – 1/3 cylindrical + 2/3 conical

diagram of a conical, cylindrical and conical didgeridoo

Diagram 3 – 1/3 conical + 1/3 cylindrical + 1/3 conical

diagram of a cylindrical didgeridoo

Diagram 4 – 100% cylindrical didgeridoo

diagram of a conical, cylindrical and cylindrical didgeridoo

Diagram 5 – 1/3 conical + 2/3 cylindrical

diagram of a cylindrical, conical and cylindrical didgeridoo

Diagram 6 – 1/3 cylindrical + 1/3 conical + 1/3 cylindrical

As you will have understood, all the subtlety will be to vary the conical / cylindrical aspect more or less on each third.
Fellow researchers, rejoice, because these are years of research available to you! Nonetheless, if I can save you some time, making a purely conical or cylindrical didjeridoo is never very good. To ensure you have a first ringing didgeridoo, avoid the first two diagrams.

Tips 2: Take care of the interior of your didgeridoo

We often see didgeridoos with a rather neat exterior. They are beautiful to see. But we are disillusioned once we take a look inside… The wood is roughly hollowed out, the collages are not clean, the finishes are not very elaborate.
Even if you are not a great handyman (for my part I can not say anything, given the state of my first test !!) and the finishes bother you, try to make a clean interior all the same. The smooth appearance of the inner wall of your didgeridoo will give it a clear and smooth sound. The vibrations can spread further.
Another defect related to the interior is the shape of the air column. It is not a question here of the famous thirds, but rather of the diameter of the air column. Try to make the diameter as round as possible and not too oval. After all, an oval diameter is a conical / cylindrical shape, but in the other direction of the cut… I don’t know if it’s very clear my business… In short, try to dig a round diameter and not an oval!

The steps of making a homemade didgeridoo

You are still here ?! Owl ! After all that, here are the few steps that will allow you to see globally the making of a didgeridoo sandwich. Thanks to Christophe Versieux, a Belgian didgeridoo player, for the photos of his didgeridoo!

Tree trunk with its roots

Step 1 – The choice of the branch (or the trunk!)

Tree trunk without roots

Step 2 – Cleaning the trunk

Cleaned tree trunk

Step 3 – debarking the trunk

The trunk is split into two parts

Step 4 – The “didgeridoo” is cut in half

Both parts are hollowed out

Step 5 – Both parts are hollowed out

the two parts are glued

Step 6 – Gluing the didgeridoo with a gasket

The didgeridoo is dry!

Step 7 – Stuck Didgeridoo!

The didgeridoo is varnished

Step 8 – The varnish and it’s done!

Conclusion: Take action and make your own didgeridoo!

So ready to make your own didgeridoo? If you are interested, you will find on the website of Biolodidg (Fr) (Stephane Bouillet), all the steps and concrete advice to make your didgeridoo. From debarking and finishing to what kind of glue it recommends, you should find something to make your didgeridoo unhindered. And if the article has you more, comment and share. It’s great to have your feedback!

Free course

Circular breathing in just a few days

Explanations that are clear, practical (!) and progressive. You’ll be surprised to see it’s simpler than it looks!

  • 7 videos in 4 steps
Learn circular breathing

5/5225 Google reviews

9962members

Read next

17 responses to “How about making your own didgeridoo ?!”

  1. Hello, regarding the question of thirds and firms, I’m not making didge yet but I’m making flutes, especially oblique ones. I think it has to do with harmonics, particularly the second one, we try to avoid nodal interferences that kill certain harmonics, the second harmonic is the fifth which corresponds to 3 times the fundamental frequency, so a constriction or a violent profile change at the thirds affects this harmonic (the first harmonic is twice the frequency so we don’t want any disturbance of the air column in the middle of the volume). By making a conical profile it’s ultimately as if we were shortening the section compared to a cylindrical profile (since more than the length it’s the volume of air that interests us) – and vice versa for cylindrical vs conical – we virtually move the third, and thus avoid having nodal interferences on the harmonics because the third in volume is at a different place than the third in length.

    It’s a somewhat intuitive explanation, I don’t know if it’s the only reason but from my modest experience in flute making and practicing the didgeridoo it seems logical to me.

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Bonjour, sur la question des tiers et des firmes, je ne fais pas encore de didge mais je fais des flûtes, notamment obliques. Le crois que ça a à voir avec les harmoniques, en particulier la deuxième, on essaie d’éviter les interférences nodales qui tuent certaines harmoniques, la deuxième harmonique c’est la quinte qui correspond à 3 fois la fréquence fondamentale, du coup un étranglement ou un changement de profil violent aux tiers affectent cette harmonique (la première harmonique c’est deux fois la fréquence donc on veut pas de perturbation de la colonne d’air au milieu du volume). En faisant un profil conique c’est finalement comme si on raccourcissait la section par rapport à un profil cylindrique (puisque plus que la longueur c’est le volume d’air qui nous intéresse) – et vice versa pour cylindrique vs conique – on déplace virtuellement le tiers, et on évite ainsi d’avoir des interférences nodales sur les harmoniques car le tiers en volume est à un autre endroit que le tiers en longueur.

    C’est une explication un peu intuitive, je ne sais pas si c’est la seule raison mais vu de ma modeste expérience de fabrication de flûtes et de pratique du didgeridoo ça me paraît logique.

    1. Gauthier Aubé Avatar
      Gauthier Aubé

      Thanks Bertrand for sharing your knowledge and thoughts on the subject. I’m not entirely sure I understood everything precisely, but I think I did, and I hadn’t made the connection between the fact that the “third volume” and “third length” are not at the same location.
      For researchers in didgeridoo making, here’s some food for thought!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Merci Bertrand pour ce partage de connaisses et tes réflexions sur le sujet. Je ne suis pas certain d’avoir tout compris précisément mais je crois que oui et je n’avais fait le lien entre le fait que le “tiers volume” et le “tiers longueur” ne soit pas au même endroit.
      Pour les chercheuses et chercheurs en fabrication, voilà de la matière à réflexion !

  2. Ambroise Avatar
    Ambroise

    Hi Gauthier, my branch was extremely dry and so it has a hole of 3 or 4 centimeters corresponding to a knot and a few very fine cracks. Is the didge ruined?
    Thanks

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Salut Gautier, ma branche était extrêmement seiche et donc elle a un trou de 3 ou 4 centimètres correspondant à un neud et quelques fissures très fines. Est-ce que c’est foutu pour le didge ?
    Merci

    1. Gauthier Aubé Avatar
      Gauthier Aubé

      Hi Ambroise,
      Normally no! Often if there are holes due to knots especially, makers fill them back with wood filler and it works really well.
      As for fine cracks, they’re often worked on with Araldite glue, it’s not very eco-friendly but it works pretty well.
      I’m far from being an expert in making didgeridoos but I hope that helps you!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Salut Ambroise,
      Normalement non ! Souvent si il y a des trous du aux noeuds notamment, les fabricants les rebouchent avec de la pâte à bois et ça fonctionne très bien.
      Quand aux fissures fines, elles sont souvent travaillées avec de la colle Araldite, ça n’est pas très écolo mais ça fonctionne plutôt bien.
      Je suis loin d’être un expert en fabrication mais j’espère que ça t’aidera !

  3. Quentin Avatar
    Quentin

    Hi Gauthier

    I recently cut some boxwood from the forest legally (two large pieces, one of which is very conical and has quite a few zigzags – these are the first ones I’m going to try to make. I was thinking of making one 1.70 meters long for a deep sound. Do you think I’m on the right track?

    They have holes of about 1cm in certain places. Does that mean they’re ruined for didgeridoos? Are they likely to produce a different sound once finished? How do I fill them in?

    Thank you so much for all your advice – you’ve inspired me to make one.

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Bonjour Gauthier

    J’ai récemment coupé du buis dans la forêt légalement (deux gros morceaux dont un en forme très conique et qui fait pas mal de zigzags, ce sont les premiers que je vais essayer de faire, je pensais en faire un de 1.70 mètre pour le son grave, penses tu que je me dirige sur le bon chemin ?
    Ils ont des trous d’environ 1cm à certains endroits, cela veut dire qu’ils sont foutus pour les didg? Ils risquent de donner un son différent un fois finis ? Comment les reboucher ?

    Merci beaucoup pour tous tes conseils, tu m’a donné envie d’en réaliser.

    1. Hello Quentin,

      Very happy if I can inspire you to make one. 🙂
      I’ll try to answer your questions:

      I was thinking of making one 1.70 meters long for a deep sound, do you think I’m on the right track?
      The key will depend a lot on your conical/cylindrical ratio. You can very simply simulate the key you’ll get with DidgMo software (free and online). I talk about it in this article.

      They have holes about 1cm in some places, does that mean they’re ruined for didges? Will they risk giving a different sound once finished? How do I plug them?
      Holes aren’t too serious, you just need to plug them with wood filler. Of course, this always has an impact on the sound but it’s so minimal you won’t hear it. After that, I haven’t seen the trunk and I’m not much of a technician when it comes to making so I’m being cautious but normally it should be fine. 🙂

      Hope I’ve helped you!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Bonjour Quentin,

      Très heureux si je peux te donner envie d’en fabriquer. 🙂
      Je vais tâcher de répondre à tes questions :

      Je pensais en faire un de 1.70 mètre pour le son grave, penses tu que je me dirige sur le bon chemin ?
      La note va beaucoup dépendre de ton rapport conique / cylindre. Tu peux simuler très simplement la note que tu obtiendras avec le logiciel DidgMo (gratuit et en ligne). J’en parle dans cet article.

      Ils ont des trous d’environ 1cm à certains endroits, cela veut dire qu’ils sont foutus pour les didg? Ils risquent de donner un son différent un fois finis ? Comment les reboucher ?
      Des trous ne sont pas très graves, il suffit de les reboucher avec de la pâte à bois. Bien sûr, cela à toujours un incident sur le son mais il est tellement minime que tu ne l’entendras pas. Après, je n’ai pas vu le tronc et je ne suis pas non plus un grand technicien au niveau fabrication donc je met de réserve mais normalement c’est tout bon. 🙂

      J’espère t’avoir aidé !

      1. Quentin Avatar
        Quentin

        Hi Gauthier

        Thank you so much for your help, it’s really valuable to me. I think I’ll have more questions to ask you later. I’m getting more and more motivated to make my didge, it’s a shame it needs a few months to dry, but at least I’ll have time to learn about it.

        Have a great day

        Automatically translated from French · See the original

        Bonjour Gauthier

        Merci beaucoup pour ton aide, elle m est très précieuse, je pense avoir d autres questions que je te poserais plus tard, je suis de plus en plus motivé à faire mon didg, dommage qu’il nécessite d attendre quelques mois qu’il sèche mais comme ça j aurais le temps de me renseigner dessus.
        Bonne journée

  4. Thom's Avatar
    Thom’s

    Hi everyone!!
    First of all, thank you Gauthier for your articles and for sharing your passion.

    I’m just starting out in this world^^ and I’m trying to learn how to play the didge (your advice videos are great!) and that’s why I just started making my first sandidge. I’m at the part where I need to cut it in two….xD the branch that inspired me to get into this is poplar.
    However, I just found out that this wood isn’t recommended – should I abandon this project or should I be more careful with the construction (hollowing it out leaving 1mm thickness) so it’s heavier?
    I’d also like your advice on the exterior protection of the didge – what varnish to use, as I’ve heard many different opinions (bio-urethane, polyurethane, oil, etc…)

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Bonjours a tous !!
    Tout d’abord merci Gauthier pour tes articles et le partage de ta passion.

    Je débute tout juste dans cette univers la^^ et j’essaie d’apprendre a jouer du didge ( tes videos conseil son au top !) et c’est pourquoi je viens d’attaquer la fabrication de mon premier sandidge. J’en suis a la partie ou il faut que je le coupe en deux …. xD la branche qui ma inspiré a me lancé la dedans es du peuplier.
    Cependant je viens de voir que cette essence n’était pas conseillé faut-il que j’abandonne ce projet ou que je soit plus attentif a la fabrication ( le creusé en laissant 1mm épaisseur ) afin qu’il soit plus “lourd” ?
    j’aimerai avoir également vos conseils pour la protection extérieur du didge quel vernis utilisé, ayant eu énormément de son de cloche différent ( bioréthane, polyuréthane, huile,etc …)

    1. Hi Thom’s,

      Sorry for the delay in getting back to you—your comment got lost in my inbox. I’ll do my best to help!

      For your didge, I’d suggest finishing it all the way through. It’s always good practice, and the didgeridoo can still sound really great! It’d be a shame to give up on it. 🙂 That said, yes, I’d recommend keeping about 1cm thickness, especially on the first third. That’s how most didges should be!

      For the varnish, I’d written an article: https://gauthieraube.com/pourquoi-et-comment-vernir-son-didgeridoo/

      Otherwise, you could check out france-didgeridoo for more info and tips. There are plenty of DIY builders on the forum.

      Happy building!

      PS: and thanks for the kind words about the videos!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Bonjour Thom’s,

      Désolé pour ce temps de réponse, ton commentaire est passé inaperçu dans mes derniers mails. Je vais tâcher de te répondre au mieux !
      Pour ton didge, je te conseille de le terminer jusqu’au bout. Ca te fait toujours un exercice et le didgeridoo peut quand même sonner très bien ! Ca serait dommage de t’en privé. 🙂 Par contre, oui je te conseille de garder 1cm d’épaisseur surtout sur le premier tiers. Ca devrait être comme ça sur la plupart des didges !
      Pour le vernis, j’avais écris un article : https://gauthieraube.com/pourquoi-et-comment-vernir-son-didgeridoo/
      Sinon il te reste france-didgeridoo pour aller chiner des infos et des conseils. Il y a plein de bricoleurs sur le forum.
      Bonne fabrication à toi !

      PS: et merci pour le compliment sur les vidéos !

  5. Hey Gauthier,

    For oak and well, you can make very good didges, I can confirm that =)

    This wood type isn’t very appreciated in didgeridoo making because, I quote:

    “Oak … the grain isn’t straight, it’s heavy, hard to work with…, it cracks…, it moves over time and there are lots of knots…. that’s enough for the didgeridoo making industry to lose interest in it… and for good reason.

    that said, a scratch (wooden didge) in oak, with pieces that are really dry and well chosen, it’s highly doable, but it won’t revolutionize the world of didgeridoo making….”

    For the didge it’s the same, in my opinion…

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Salut Gauthier,

    Pour le chêne et bien on peut fabriquer de très bons didgs, je confirme =)

    Cette essence n’est pas très apprécié en lutherie car, je cite :

    “Le chène … le fil n’est pas droit, c’est lourd, dur à travailler …, ça fend …., ça travaille sur le long terme et il y a beaucoup de noeux …. cela suffit pour que la filière lutherie s’en désintéresse … à juste titre.

    cela étant, une gratte en chène, avec des morceaux bien secs et bien choisis, c’est hautement faisable, mais cela ne révolutionnera pas le monde la lutherie ….”

    Pour le didg c’est pareil, à mon avis…

    1. “that said, a scraper made of oak, with pieces that are nice and dry and well-chosen, is totally doable, but it won’t revolutionize the world of didgeridoo making….”
      I think that says it all! A didgeridoo made of oak will of course sound good, but I’m pretty sure the same setup would sound better in another type of wood.
      But that’s just my opinion, everyone should test it and form their own idea. 🙂

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      “cela étant, une gratte en chène, avec des morceaux bien secs et bien choisis, c’est hautement faisable, mais cela ne révolutionnera pas le monde la lutherie …. »
      Je pense que tout est dit ! Un didgeridoo en chêne sonnera bien sûr, mais certainement que la même configuration sonnera mieux dans un autre bois.
      Mais ça reste que mon avis, à chacun de tester et de se faire une idée. 🙂

  6. Daniel Avatar
    Daniel

    Hello Gauthier,
    I live in Garrigue and I make didgeridoos out of Arbutus, Holm oak, and Cedar. But unfortunately, I make them oval despite all my efforts! That said, they still sound pretty good.
    See you soon
    Daniel

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Bonjour Gauthier,
    J’habite en Garrigue et je fabrique des didgeridoos en Arbousier en Chêne vert et en Cèdre. Mais hélas, je les faits ovales malgré tous mes efforts ! N’empêche qu’ils sonnent pas mal.
    À plus
    Daniel

    1. fabrice Avatar
      fabrice

      Hello everyone,
      to minimize the oval shape, even if it’s not essential for a good sound…., I use a wood carving disc which allows me to control the effort associated with a round template that I slide to adjust the depth.
      the result is pretty good.
      best regards and thank you Gauthier for all these articles.

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      bonjour à tous,
      pour minimiser la forme ovale , même si cela n’est pas primordial pour un bon son…. , moi j utilise un disque a sculpter pour bois cela permet de doser l effort associer a un gabarit rond que je glisse pour regler la profondeur.
      le resultat pas mal.
      bien a vous et merci gauthier pour tous tes ces articles.

      1. Indeed, I had already heard that the grinding disc is a good tool for hollowing. A tool to handle with care!

        As for the oval shape, it’s true that it’s not essential, but it’s still very important if you want to aim for precision.
        Indeed, the whole thing about thirds that are more or less conical/cylindrical is cancelled out if there’s an oval shape. Because the chosen shape must have an effect on the entire diameter and not just in 2D.

        Automatically translated from French · See the original

        Effectivement, j’avais déjà entendu que le disque à sculpter est un bon outils pour creuser. Un outils à manier avec soin !

        Pour la forme ovale, c’est vrai que ça n’est pas indispensable mais c’est tout de même très important si l’on souhaite aller dans la précision.
        En effet, le coup des tiers plus ou moins coniques / cylindriques est annulé si il y a la forme ovale. Car la forme choisi doit se répercuter sur l’ensemble du diamètre et pas uniquement en 2D.

    2. Thanks Daniel, the woods you mentioned will help point some people in the right direction!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Merci Daniel les essences que tu as cité, ça pourra en aiguiller certains !

  7. As usual, a very interesting article. In my opinion, we could add this piece of advice: drying the wood after felling, minimum 6 to 12 months, to prevent the wood from cracking.

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Comme d’habitude, article très intéressant, à mon avis on peut rajouter comme conseil : le séchage du bois après la coupe sur pied, min 6 mois à 12 mois, pour éviter que le bois fissure.

    1. Thanks Nicolas for your advice. I think Stephane talks about drying on his blog (biolodidg) but I’m not sure… Anyway, it’s done now. 🙂

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Merci Nicolas pour ton conseil. Je crois que Stephane parle du séchage sur son blog (biolodidg) mais pas sûr… Dans tous les cas, voilà qui est fait. 🙂

Leave a Reply