Skip to content

Backpressure and the Didgeridoo: What if we’re focusing on the wrong debate?

This episode is in French. My podcast is only available in French for now.

If you play the didgeridoo, you have definitely already heard this word: backpressure. Maybe you even chose your instrument based on this criterion. At first glance, it seems to explain (very simply) a lot of things on its own:

  • high backpressure = an easy-to-play didgeridoo
  • low backpressure = a difficult didgeridoo, one that uses a lot of air

But… isn’t this apparent simplicity a bit too simplistic?

In this article, I’d like to add a bit of nuance, and above all ask a fundamental question: what if, by focusing on backpressure, we end up missing what really matters?

Let’s dive in!

Backpressure, or your didgeridoo’s air consumption

Backpressure is the resistance of the air column when you blow into your didgeridoo.
The higher this resistance, the more you feel the instrument “pushes back” against you. The result:

  • you use less air
  • the volume is higher
  • the instrument feels “easy to play”

And that’s exactly why so many players look for high backpressure. You simply seem to get less out of breath with that kind of instrument!

But be careful: this search comes at a cost… And to understand this “problem,” we first need to distinguish between the two main didgeridoo shapes.

Two major didgeridoo families

1. Conical didgeridoos

Yoon on a conical didgeridoo with a powerful style!

These are the most common instruments in the world today (with the exception of France). Their air column starts at around 30 mm (note: I’m not talking about the mouthpiece here, but the starting diameter of the didgeridoo once the mouthpiece is removed), and their bells are often wide and flared (a bit like a trumpet). This creates very specific characteristics:

  • naturally high backpressure, therefore low air consumption
  • a powerful sound
  • present low frequencies
  • an immediate feeling of ease

These instruments are perfect for dynamic playing based on tongue work. They are often used by street musicians because they naturally sound loud without amplification. In short: they’re powerful!

But this power comes with trade-offs (as you might expect!):

  • the sound can sometimes lack clarity
  • because of their strong low end, the overall spectrum can feel unbalanced
  • the instrument is “specialized” for certain tongue-based styles, but often sounds less good for other techniques, such as cheek techniques for example
  • when amplified, this kind of didgeridoo can quickly become overwhelming: the lows eat up everything

2. Cylindrical didgeridoos

The ork army, which I can only play on an open didgeridoo

The air column of this type of didgeridoo starts around 50 mm, and their bells are often less conical, giving the instrument a more cylindrical overall shape. As for their characteristics, they are basically the opposite of conical didgeridoos:

  • a softer, more melodic sound
  • more readable harmonics
  • perfect for “cheek” techniques (wobbles, for example)

But be careful: this shape also has a cost! These instruments are often considered “difficult” because they have little backpressure and therefore, as you’ve now understood, higher air consumption.

The trap: believing one shape is better than another (yes, I fell for it too!)

It may sound obvious, but let’s remember that there is no:

  • perfect didgeridoo
  • shape that is superior to another
  • magic criterion to rely on exclusively

There are instruments suited to different intentions. It’s basic, but it’s worth repeating!

Personally, for a long time I had no affinity with conical shapes. I was drawn only to cylindrical, open didgeridoos. But the more I discover traditional playing (yidaki), the more I become aware of the strengths of conical shapes.

Little by little, I realize just how much each shape tells its own story.

And that’s where this omnipresent notion of backpressure becomes disturbing: it pushes all the other criteria aside.

Backpressure: the criterion that crushes all the others

When you choose a didgeridoo only for its backpressure, you risk:

  • prioritizing immediate comfort (low air consumption)
  • seeking quick volume (possibly at the expense of quality)
  • sacrificing other aspects like finesse, dynamics, or harmonics… on the altar of comfort!

In short, you focus on the instrument. Obsessed as we are with backpressure, we end up believing that it’s the didgeridoo that “holds the air” for us.

And that is precisely our mistake!

Your body is your instrument

If you should remember just one idea from this article, let it be this:

Everything starts from your body. Not from the didgeridoo.

I’ll say it again, because it’s that important:

EVERYTHING starts from your body. NOT from the didgeridoo.

Once you understand this basic principle, you’ll start focusing on the essential elements that truly impact your sound and your playing:

  • the pinch at the corners of your lips
  • your breath management
  • the tonicity of your air column

With these levers, you have real power to act. You are no longer a “victim” of your didgeridoo. You become the creator of your own world. That’s personally what motivates me in teaching didgeridoo: guiding you toward mastery (I talk a lot about it in my online courses—there’s the promo!).

In this context, the notion of backpressure becomes secondary. And your didgeridoo choice is no longer narrowed down to that single aspect, but naturally opens up to what you want to express, what you love, what drives you…

The real question to ask

Here we finally are at the heart of this article, and at the only question that truly matters:

What do you want to express with your didgeridoo? And to do that, what do you need?

  • power?
  • finesse?
  • groove?
  • breath?
  • voice?
  • relaxation?
  • dynamics?
  • harmonics?

As you’ve understood, there are no right or wrong answers—only a balance (sometimes a fragile one) between your didgeridoo, your desires, your intentions, and your story.

In conclusion

Backpressure isn’t useless—far from it! But in my opinion, making it the main criterion means missing what really matters.

Your body is the instrument, your didgeridoo amplifies it. You are in control. And when you understand that… everything changes.


To go further in understanding the didgeridoo

4 essential criteria to understand the psychology of your didgeridoo!

Why analyzing your didgeridoo’s frequencies will help you play better!

Photo credit: Olivier Trubert

Free course

Speed up your phrasing with wobbles

Increasing your speed means learning to let go. When you do, you give your didgeridoo its rightful place, and all that’s left is to listen to it.

  • 8 videos
  • For you if you are going round in circles with your habits

5/5225 Google reviews

9953members

Read next

15 responses to “Backpressure and the Didgeridoo: What if we’re focusing on the wrong debate?”

  1. 23rainita Avatar
    23rainita

    Hello Gauthier. I’m in Peru, learning to play with your online lessons. First of all thank you for your patience and clarity. It’s helping me a lot. I have a question. I can play the instrument (i have an airdidge) and i can easily do the circular breathing. I noticed my lips only buzz when they touch the mouthpiece, not before and not after, when i remove the lips from the mouthpiece. If i buzz my lips before touching the mouthpiece and while playing, i use a lot of air and the sound is not smooth at all. Am i doing something wrong? Thank you again for your help

    1. Hi! I juste answered you by email, you can send me a video WhatsApp. It will be clearer for me. 🙂
      And nice to have you in Peru!

  2. Pierre-Yves Bour Avatar
    Pierre-Yves Bour

    Hello Gauthier and all.
    Thanks for your analyses.
    I have 2 Colas didges: a large C and a conical C#.
    Indeed the conical seems more flattering, and playing for several days with it makes returning to the large one more difficult.
    I enjoy playing both, but to do a small demo for my neophyte friends, I take the conical which (at my level…) delivers heavy and impresses.
    An amusing observation on the conical: in drop-jaw, if I move my lips away just a tiny bit from the mouthpiece, you get the impression that they are “sucked in” or held back by the didge.
    Cheers
    Pierre-Yves

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Hello Gauthier et tous.
    Merci pour tes analyses.
    J ai 2 didg Colas un large do et un conique do#.
    Effectivement le conique paraît plus flatteur, et jouer plusieurs jours avec rend plus difficile le retour au large.
    Je prends du plaisir avec les 2 , mais pour faire une petite demo à des copains néophytes, je prends le conique qui ( avec mon niveau…) envoi du lourd et impressionne.
    Un constat amusant sur le conique : en sousvibration, si j’éloigne un tout petit peu les lèvres de l embouchure, on a l’impression qu elles sont ” aspirée” ou retenue par le didg.
    Amicalement
    Pierre-Yves

  3. Valérie Thomas Avatar
    Valérie Thomas

    That voice is quite pleasant and the precision is really helpful… ; )

    Thank you Gauthier for all your dedication and passion : )

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Bien agréable cette voix et précisions bien utiles ma foi… ; )

    Merci Gauthier d’autant d’implication et de passion : )

    1. Thanks Valérie! I’m falling in love with this audio format, it’s so convenient for sharing your ideas!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Merci Valérie ! Je suis entrain de tomber amoureux de ce format audio, c’est tellement pratique pour diffuser ses idées !

  4. Lorys Masson Avatar
    Lorys Masson

    Hi Gauthier, I think that’s the most constructive thing I’ve heard about the didgeridoo. ?

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Bonjour Gauthier, je crois que c’est la chose la plus constructive que j’ai entendu sur le didgeridoo. ?

    1. jaime Avatar
      jaime

      Super Gauthier!!!
      Thanks for this podcast, you’re right it’s really amazing to be able to hear you like that, like on the radio.
      And I love hearing your vision of things regarding this magnificent instrument that is the didgeridoo.
      Honestly I want more!!! I want more!!!
      You have a really unique vision of this instrument.
      You let me see something else in it than just a simple piece of wood.
      I loved your speech about “the instrument is you”, “relying on the didgeridoo is a crutch”…

      In this small niche that is the didgeridoo, I find it important to be able to share our visions, it’s so enriching!!!

      More!!!!

      Big hugs

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Super Gauthier !!!
      Merci pour ce podcast, tu as raison c’est vraiment génial de pouvoir t’entendre comme ça comme à la radio.
      Et puis j’adore entendre ta vision des choses par rapport à cet instrument de magnifique qu’est le didgeridoo.
      Franchement j’en veux d’autres !!! j’en veux d’autres !!!
      Tu as une vision vraiment particulière de cet instrument.
      Tu me permets d’y voir autre chose qu’un simple bout de bois.
      J’ai adoré ton discours sur” l’instrument c’est vous”, ” se reposer sur le didgeridoo est une béquille”…

      Dans cette petite niche qu’est le didgeridoo, je trouve ça important de pouvoir partager nos visions, c’est tellement enrichissant !!!

      Encoreeeeeeee !!!!

      Gros bisous

      1. Thank you Jaime! Count on me to keep going!! 🙂

        Automatically translated from French · See the original

        Merci Jaime ! Compte sur moi pour continuer !! 🙂

    2. So I’ll try to keep chatting. 🙂
      Thanks Lorys for your encouragement.

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Alors je vais essayer de continuer à papoter. 🙂
      Merci Lorys pour tes encouragements.

  5. GERALD Avatar
    GERALD

    Good evening Gauthier,
    I listened to your podcast on backpressure. You had told us about it during our workshop, and following your comments I rushed when I got back from the workshop to make myself a cylindrical didgeridoo. It’s a B key, 1m65 in length with a 10 cm bell. It’s made of alder.

    I’m used to playing on a conical one and I realized it took me some time to adapt to playing on a cylindrical shape! Indeed, it’s not enough to just send pressure—quite the opposite, you have to work it with finesse. Once you’ve understood that, it produces an enchanting sound and is very pleasant to play.

    In conclusion, if I may say so, I don’t think conical ones encourage us to be lazy. They offer us a completely different kind of playing. It’s essential when choosing a didgeridoo to understand what this means.

    As for me, when I went to Grégory’s to try several, I was surprised not to be able to get the drone out on certain didges. My choice was simple—I took the one I could play. It’s only now that I understand why I couldn’t get the drone. Having both shapes seems to be the final solution.

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Bonsoir Gauthier,
    j’ai écouté ton podcast sur la backpressure. Tu nous en avais parlé lors de notre stage, suite à tes commentaires je me suis empressé à mon retour de stage de me fabriquer un didgeridoo cylindrique. C’est un SI longueur de 1m65 avec une cloche de 1O cm. Il est en aulne.

    Je suis habitué à jouer sur un conique et je me suis aperçu qu’il me fallait un certain temps d’adaptation pour jouer sur une forme cylindrique ! En effet, il ne suffit pas d’envoyer la pression tout au contraire il faut le travailler tout en finesse. Une fois que l’on a compris, il dégage un son envoutant et très agréable à jouer.

    En conclusion, si je peux me permettre, je ne crois pas que les coniques nous incitent à la paresse. Ils nous offrent un jeu complètement différent. Il est impératif au choix d’un didgeridoo de savoir ce qu’il en est.

    Me concernant, quand je suis allé chez Grégory pour en essayer plusieurs j’étais surpris de ne pas pouvoir sortir le bourdon sur certains didges. Mon choix a été simple, j’ai pris celui avec lequel je pouvais jouer. C’est seulement maintenant que je comprends pourquoi je ne pouvais pas avoir le bourdon. Avoir les deux formes me semble être la solution finale.

    1. Hey Gérald,
      You’re right to add nuance. I tend to be quite sharp in my ideas. The conical didgeridoo certainly has beautiful qualities. And a balanced didgeridoo is often the happy medium between these two shapes.

      In any case, having didgeridoos that are distinctly different is very educational. It helps you understand where you stand better!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Salut Gérald,
      Effectivement, tu as raison de mettre des nuances. Je suis toujours un peu tranché dans mes idées. Le didgeridoo conique a bien sûr de belles qualités. Et un didgeridoo équilibré est souvent le juste milieu entre ces deux formes.

      Dans tous les cas, avoir des didgeridoos franchement différents est très formateur. Ça permet de mieux se situer !

  6. SaïSaï Avatar
    SaïSaï

    Hello Gauthier,
    Well, this is all amazing Gauthier, really interesting stuff, except that for me it’s a bit too early for all that, I’m only on page 60 of your book and I’m managing to get circular breathing after two months. All thanks to you… and a little bit to me, because I’m working on it every evening. Anyway, I’m making steady progress and thanks for your advice. I’m still on my PVC tube, but I love it so much that I’ll come back to you for some tips on seriously buying a real didge when school starts again and I’m definitely planning to take your online courses at the same time. I preferred to start with PVC because I wasn’t sure if I could do it, but I’m getting there. Thanks again.

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Hello Gauthier,
    Bah, c’est super tout ça Gauthier, super intéressant, sauf que pour moi c’est un peu trop tôt tout ça, j’en suis qu’à la page 60 de ton livre et j’arrive au bout de deux mois à avoir le souffle circulaire. Tout ça grâce à toi… et un petit peu a moi, car je m’y attèle tous les soirs. En tout cas j’avance tranquillement et merci pour tes conseils. Je suis toujours sur mon tube PVC, mais je kiffe tellement que je reviendrais vers toi pour quelques conseils pour un achat sérieux d’un vrai Didge à la rentrée et compte bien par la même occasion prendre les cours en lignes. j’ai préféré commencé par le PVC car je ne savais pas si j’allais y arriver, mais je tiens le bon bout. Merci encore.

    1. So happy to read your message SaïSaï! Whenever I see that I’m motivating a player to get playing, I’m truly thrilled. 🙂

      And it’s mostly thanks to you that you’ve got the circular breathing, you can be proud of yourself. It’s always a big moment when you reach milestones like that!

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Très heureux de lire ton message SaïSaï ! Dès que je vois que je motive un joueur ou une joueuse à souffler, je suis vraiment heureux. 🙂

      Et c’est surtout grâce à toi que tu as le souffle, tu peux être fier de toi. C’est toujours un grand moment quand on passe des paliers comme celui-là !

  7. olivier luis Avatar
    olivier luis

    Hi Gauthier,

    Very interesting and relevant analysis… I noticed through this topic that as I’ve progressed in my practice, I’ve ended up with almost only cylindrical shapes…. Besides, one might think that someone just starting out would feel more confident with higher back pressure in the sense that they can more easily access certain sensations and build confidence more easily, more quickly…. that said, reminding that the body is the engine and the didgeridoo the echo of this being, seems very important to me, even fundamental…. as you state it, playing with a didgeridoo where the column is more open, offers infinite possibilities (exploration, self-questioning, …) on the playing. Now, not everyone is necessarily on this work axis….. hence a form of reassurance and reliance on a didgeridoo with high pressure (living on past achievements)…. in any case, thanks for this podcast that encourages reflection and self-questioning ! or maybe not after all…..Olivier

    Automatically translated from French · See the original

    Salut Gauthier,

    Analyse très intéressante et pertinente de surcroit….je me suis aperçu à travers ce sujet qu’en évoluant dans ma pratique , je n’ai quasiment plus que des formes cylindriques….Par ailleurs, on pourrait penser qu’une personne qui débute sera plus facilement mis en confiance avec une back pressure plus élevée en ce sens qu’elle peut accéder plus aisément à certaines sensations et une mise en confiance plus aisée, plus rapide….ceci étant, rappeler que le corps est le moteur et le didgeridoo l’écho de cet être, me semble très important, voire fondamental ….comme tu le stipule, jouer avec un didgeridoo où la colonne est plus ouverte, offre une infinité de potentialités (recherches, remise en question, …) sur le jeu. Maintenant, tout le monde n’est pas forcément sur cet axe de travail…..d’où une forme d’assurance et de repos sur un didgeridoo avec une pression élevée (vivre sur ses acquis)….en tous cas, merci pour ce podcast qui incite à la réflexion et la remise en question ! ou pas d’ailleurs…..Olivier

    1. Hey Olivier!

      I went a bit overboard. 🙂 Still, I should clarify that the conical shape has some real advantages. And of course, not all players who play this shape are lazy! 🙂

      It’s mainly the fact that conical didgeridoos represent a huge percentage of didgeridoo production… Pretty unfortunate!

      But over time, I can see things are progressing a lot anyway. In 15 years, things have already changed quite a bit (at least in France).

      Automatically translated from French · See the original

      Salut Olivier !

      J’y suis allé un peu fort. 🙂 Je précise quand même que la forme conique a de beaux avantages. Et bien sûr, tous les joueurs qui jouent cette forme ne sont pas des feignants ! 🙂

      C’est surtout le fait que les didgeridoos coniques représentent un énorme pourcentage de la production de didgeridoo… Plutôt dommage !

      Mais avec le temps, je vois que ça progresse beaucoup quand même. En 15 ans, les choses ont déjà beaucoup changées (au moins en France).

Leave a Reply